The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Other nominations aside, the consensus on this specific nomination is that this particular individual passes GNG. If anyone disagrees, I am not opposed to this NAC being reverted. (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anastasia Chernova[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 22:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Alright, so apparently you nominated a fair number of Miss Universe single-nation pageant winners for AfD, I guess. For almost any non-African country, sources will be readily found. For Ukraine, you simply need to look up the Ukrainian spelling of her name, and you find sources.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:28, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. I think I've saved this one, but maybe some others can also be improved. Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:11, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep How could someone win this for their nation without getting ample coverage in their native language? Dream Focus 16:44, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There seems to be a move afoot to try to eliminate Miss Universe contestants. I've commented on other AfD's where the Noms were in bad faith. This one too, there is plenty of coverage, particularly if you count pictures (thus the lack of prose). This is a beauty contest winner and contestant, that's what you'd expect. I just added six sources to the article, not one of them repeating the same picture. Miss Universe is a commercial, media event. There is plenty of coverage of each contestant. Lesser sources rating their chances. Notability achieved simply by being in the pageant. If you want to remove it wholesale, then you can talk about the merits of the contest, but that is a much bigger discussion. Don't expect rocket science or even the answer to world peace to be coming out of any of their heads. If you want to remove worthless notability, lets start with Kim Kardashian, but that is not what wikipedia does. The mere selection to Miss Universe is sufficient to establish notability. Lets agree on that fact and move on. Trackinfo (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Current Wikipedia rules would seem to consider her to pass WP:GNG. --Jersey92 (talk) 04:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per keep votes above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:35, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.