The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Renata3 05:33, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• As the deleting admin, I take responsibility for this action. --Deathphoenix 16:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anathemacious[edit]

Neologism, does not seem to be used anywhere but Wikipedia mirrors and 2 blogs [1], one of which coincidently is linked to from the article. Probably not a good Wiktionary candidate for this reason. --W.marsh 22:25, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - dicdef, neologism -Satori ^(talk) 22:54, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete anathemaciously. Endomion 23:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - FrancisTyers 23:45, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Looks like the article creator has a vendetta against the blog linked from the usage example. --Quarl 00:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.