The result was Delete. SpinningSpark 20:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
...Bxxt:
This page is the landing spot for all NLP-related AfD notices. We now return you to your normal deletion request ....
Few, poor sources. Other tagged concerns not addressed after a more than adequate period of time. Serious notability concerns due to the fact that this is a concept from a technique described as "pseudoscientific" and "discredited" in its main article. Famousdog (talk) 06:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because they suffer from much the same problems as the Anchoring article. There are far too many separate articles all saying very similar things that all rest upon the shaky foundation of a discredited pseudoscientific pyramid scheme. This is not science.Reply[reply]
Famousdog (talk) 06:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(citation required) One of the most interesting things about this on-going slow motion edit war is the insistence by editors attacking NLP that NLP is not science and is a pseudo-science, when NLP has never claimed to be a science; the claim made by NLP is that it is magical! Good faith leads me to believe that they know of a different NLP than that the article was about years ago. htom (talk) 04:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]shaky foundation of a discredited pseudoscientific pyramid scheme. This is not science.
I've added History of neuro-linguistic programming and several other articles having looked at their rather weak references sections. Again, any "useful" information from these pages could be easily merged with the main NLP article. They do not need or deserve separate articles and I am concerned that these articles are simply being used as content forks. I hope nobody minds me adding these after the fact, but exactly the same issues apply. One of these articles has been marked as refimprove since 2007!!! Famousdog (talk) 08:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
(cur | prev) 03:15, 8 June 2012 Famousdog (talk | contribs) . . (8,832 bytes) (+47) . . (adding yet another sh*t article) (undo)
In cognitive therapy, "reframing" means cognitive reframing. If this article is deleted, could the closer please redirect to cognitive reframing? (Sorry if this comment's in the wrong spot.) --Anthonyhcole (talk) 04:47, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]