The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - filelake shoe  13:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Sutton[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This autobiography was created over three years ago (meaning it doesn't meet WP:BLP-PROD), and has since been edited 18 times by its subject. It cites no sources, and the "recent editing credits" it lists do not even come close to meeting WP:CREATIVE, and only barely even try to (if it were a new article I'd probably tag it for A7 - which I haven't completely ruled out still). It has a proliferation of spam/promotion links, and the edit history does not reflect a single content-related edit by anyone other than Mr. Sutton himself. With perhaps no exception, it reads much more like a blog homepage than an encyclopedia article, and, as such, should be deleted. — Francophonie&Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler) 13:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Workaday film editing without any awards or critical acclaim, and minimal directing work (directors are often notable, but editors usually not, especially if they work on TV). No evidence of press coverage, and it appears he's not done anything that was likely to receive press coverage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:37, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WikiPuppies _bark ^dig 16:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Mr. Sutton does not pass notability guidelines. Not everyone who works in the film industry is notable and from the lack of in-depth coverage in reliable sources, Sutton appears to be one of the many people out there that work in film and have not and probably will never achieve notability. He doesn't even pass the most basic of notability guidelines. Harsh, but that's pretty much the long and short of it.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. More a job description than specific notability?
Delete not notable. failsWP:BIO --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:04, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.