The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pink Pineapple. JForget 00:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anejiru[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable pornographic game and OVA adaptation. A search for reliable sources turned up nothing more then sales catalogs, copyvio websites, and self-published websites, such as Animetric.com. Prod was disputed. —Farix (t | c) 13:51, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- —Farix (t | c) 13:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pink Pineapple. I found no reliable source coverage of this game or the anime based on it, but I think it is a valid search term. The animation studio is probably the best place for a redirect, as the game studio doesn't have an article (and may also be non-notable). Calathan (talk) 16:39, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone search for its Japanese name? Several different names keep coming up. The Japanese Wikipedia article [1] says its been two volumes of OVA, and that the game it is based on is called Sister Juice [2] Dream Focus 07:41, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. No realiable sources to establish notability. EuroPride (talk) 19:36, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pink Pineapple This is a small non notable anime series. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:15, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Epbr123 (talk) 15:43, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.