The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anfield Online[edit]

There are claims of notability but no evidence with which to back up those claims. Ghits are what you'd expect of an online forum but no evidence of notability and if the claims can't be verified, then it's run of the mill web content. Thoughts? Will withdraw, of course, if someone can source the claims. TravellingCari 20:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- TravellingCari 20:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- TravellingCari 20:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TravellingCari 20:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
suggest merge with Liverpool FC. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That would set an alarming precedent, there are probably thousands of LFC related sites out there in webland, there's no way that the article should list them. --Ged UK (talk) 13:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:WEB. No assertion on notability of website or verification of claims made. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 03:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see any evidence of notability. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 11:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Giant Snowman 11:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Moving the below comment here from the talk page of this AfD, where it was (presumably) placed in error. I do not endorse the comment in any way -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:39, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have addressed some of the notability concerns satisfying Criteria 3 of the WP:Web. The site is also notable locally - often being invited to discuss latest LFC results on air on local radio stations. WindChillFactor (talk) 08:38, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note- In order to satisfy criterion 3 of WP:WEB you would need third party reliable sources. Sources you have provided belong to website in concern here. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 11:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've restored the notability and sourcing tags. Sourcing it to the own site doesn't fulfill notability through reliable sources. StarM 13:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' Non-notable. Even with the addition it still doesn't satisfy WP:WEB for me. Being invited onto local radio stations to talk about the results of the club is notability of the club and the station I'd have thought, not the site. --Ged UK (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fan sites are two-a-penny (especially for a big club like this), and I can't see why this site is more notable than any of the others. Bettia (rawr!) 14:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable Skitzo (talk) 19:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.