The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. –mysid☎ 19:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of the article does not meet the guidelines for notability per WP:BIO. No significant contributions or media coverage. Nv8200ptalk 18:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Non-notable bio. *drew 09:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yuser31415 03:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless someone can find a notable mention in the Singapore press. (I can't imagine someone like this being covered in any other verifiable source.) Alba 05:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. If someone can find even a single decent source then I'd say keep. --Delirium 08:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless sourced and referenced i.a.w. WP:BIOAlf photoman 12:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The homepage of the Singapore Pharmacy Board does include a listing for Ang Hui Gek under the "A" section of this page. It says that she is affiliated with the Allied Health Division of Singapore General Hospital. This government report lists her as president of the Singapore Pharmacy Board, and also confirms her title as chief pharmacist on page 9. Since those are official publications, that should satisfy WP:V, at least. I'll start checking for newspaper coverage next. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 22:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, she's quoted in her official capacity in this article by Channel News Asia, but that's it. Did anyone check whether there's an article in Malay/Mandarin/Tamil Wikipedia? Those might have additional sources... -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 22:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody should put those references in the article because they don't help in an AfD that hardly anybody bothers to read again Alf photoman 22:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It also looks like Lexis-Nexis has five articles in The Straits Times that mention her by name between 1995 and 2002, though I can only search, not read. -22:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Though her existence and title are definitely confirmed, I do not feel that they add up to sufficient non-local notability as to meet WP:BIO. --Elonka 07:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.