- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Aniket Jadhav (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no evidence that he played on senior level or in a fully professional league. The Banner talk 11:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Kosack (talk) 15:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Not sure what WP:FOOTY means by "Tier 1 International Match" but Jadhav has played in U-17 World Cup for India ref. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 14:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - WP:NFOOTY requires a player to have played in a senior international match to be deemed notable. The under-17 world cup would not be enough to make him notable. Kosack (talk) 15:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY having never played in a senior fixture for club or country. Not enough coverage to pass WP:GNG either. Kosack (talk) 15:43, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I would like to mention that even though he is 16 years old and hasn't made a senior team appearance but he is one of the most talented and upcoming players in India. I have edited the article(please visit the article page) to add more information and new citation links meaning the subject has more than enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Reliable source on football Goal.com has at least 14 articles where Aniket Jadhav is mentioned extensively playing football for his club and Indian National Youth Team. Below are the links:
[1]
[2]
[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]
[13]
[14]
[15] Football india (talk) 21:32, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There is no question that the subject fails WP:NFOOTY. There are a good number of articles which mention Jadhav, as Football india has pointed out. However, WP:GNG requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (emphasis original). This means that mere mentions of the subject, regardless of the number of articles in which the subject is mentioned, are insufficient; match reports such as this are debarred by WP:ROUTINE from being considered in support of a subject's notability, though they can be used to support facts. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 07:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. The comment with the numerous links above does not show GNG. All the sources provided are routine match reporting. There is not a single source contained within them that is dedicated to the player bar this which does discuss the player in a little detail but is focussed more on youth football in India in general.
- Looking at the other sources, for example this source noted above contains axactly one sentence in a match report on the player. This sort of reporting is never considered acceptable for GNG as it by definition is never dedicated to specific players and is produced for a huge range of team ranging from national media dealing with top level competition to local media dealing with regional amateur competitions. Fenix down (talk) 07:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.