The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment -Subject doesn't meet the WP:BIO, WP:GNG or even WP:ANYBIO standard. But looking at their contribution in multiple notable films, to me it appears that WP:ENT crtieria #3 may be cited for their notability which states, "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.". Anupmehra -Let's talk!10:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think he fails WP:ENT too. Dubbing roles weren't unique or innovative. Prolific might be hundreds of roles, not a dozen. He'd have to be mentioned somewhere other than in film credits. – Margin1522 (talk) 09:22, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.