The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 17:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Anthropy[edit]

Anna Anthropy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this on behalf of User:Filibusti, who has requested me to assist him in nominating it. I do not endorse the nomination or vote Delete.

Filibusti's argument, if I understand it correctly, is that the article topic is not notable per our notability policies, and additionally that the article does not meet WP:BIO. I have invited him to further explain his argument through a formal delete vote. DustFormsWords (talk) 06:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the references that go into non-trivial detail of her person would you say is an RS? I can't see any. Also, I looked through the refs on Mighty Jill Off but I didn't see any interview not already included on her page (and as I've said, they're not RS). Filibusti (talk) 08:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.