The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was - Delete and recreate as a redirect to Cuil - Peripitus (Talk) 22:10, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Patterson[edit]

Anna Patterson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Even if Cuil were notable (a big assumption), is it's founder? Misterdiscreet (talk) 17:52, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Too new, too small, and no biography to support an article, much less a need for one. Utgard Loki (talk) 18:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:02, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Cuil; nothing worthwhile to merge. --N Shar (talk · contribs) 23:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BLP1E. Notability is related exclusively to the Cuil launch and all the coverage of her for now is very short-term and only in relation to the Cuil launch. Nsk92 (talk) 23:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• merge to Cuil, coverage in secondary sources is of transient WP:NOT#NEWS nature. Biographical notability entirely inherited from Cuil (which seems wholly of WP:NOT#NEWS interest itself). Pete.Hurd (talk) 05:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.