The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. SoWhy 18:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Annabel Venning[edit]

Annabel Venning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author who does not appear to be notable. One book only. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  10:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  10:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  10:21, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Reviewed at length in Independent[1] and Telegraph[2], and Google indicates it's cited a few times in academic texts, but I'd like to see another source before saying keep. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it looks like the book was a one-off (2005) based on her personal experiences. I suspect the article was created by interested persons as her husband's article Guy Walters has had quite a lot of COI editing. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep There is an in-depth source here, plus a source where Venning is both the writer and partially the subject, and a similar story in the Daily Mail here, and another one here, and a similar writer-subject story in The Telegraph, and another one here. So, here's a question: are these stories in which Venning is both the author and the subject, in media such as the Daily Mail and The Telegraph, are these primary or secondary sources? So, I'm a bit on the fence here, but the article is not excessive, but (if it stays) there should be more information on Venning's pop-culture focus.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:09, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.