The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per CSD:A7 and WP:SNOW. Stifle (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Hunter[edit]

Anne Hunter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Basically, I'm not sure that Ms. Hunter is quite notable enough to merit her own Wikipedia article. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 00:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 01:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails notability Hornandsoccer^Talk 02:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I have actually met Anne, and my wife was one of her advisees, but this article fails to find any real notability for her. Out. Brianyoumans 02:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment We do not seem to have real criteria on educational administrators. I think the key question is whether she in N outside MIT, and one outside source would be enough. DGG 02:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:BIO. Is apparently 'legendary', but wouldn't need that connotation if this were true. No sources. Administers email lists of 2,000 people? Not notable. Possibly merge and redirect into MIT article if she has some meaning to them.--Dacium 04:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Secretary who administers e-mail lists. Are the lists notable? No. Neither is she. Pete.Hurd 04:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fails WP:BIO, WP:NN. Just a generic college administrator. Ravenswing 19:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy A7 Delete No claim to notablity outside a very specific department in MIT. A1octopus 15:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not notable. Realkyhick 17:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No other sources. Abeg92contribs 21:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not establish enough notability outside of one particular department of MIT. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 16:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, doesn't seem notable enough. NawlinWiki 12:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.