The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is no significant coverage in reliable sources to satisfy notability guidelines for WP:GNG or WP:BIO. CNMall41 (talk) 19:27, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Astrology is a fringe subject that requires good sourcing to prove notability, that is totally lacking here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.