The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ansearch[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was looking for sources to remove the advert tag but...there's just nothing about this company. There's an interview here, but it's actually about an investor and this just happens to be one of the things they discuss. This is minor non-news coverage but it appears to be a blog.

This (source of uncertain reliability) puts the site at not even the top 50k websites in the US (not encouraging), with an estimated worth of <$10k.

Seems like a small time company that was promising once, and was WP:TOOSOON when the article was created...but nine years later it's still not soon enough. TimothyJosephWood 19:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete just promotions! Light2021 (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable. Even the external links to purported co-branded sites aren't good any more (if they ever were). This tree appears to have fallen in the forest with no one to hear it. - Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.