The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Anthony (editor)[edit]

The result was Withdrawn - References found to notability. triwbe (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony (editor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No references supplied. V. difficult to find anything in English with so little key info to search for. No improvement since PROD 2 weeks ago. triwbe (talk) 19:40, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —triwbe (talk) 19:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —triwbe (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• In imdb, the editor of Sivaji is listed as "Antony": http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2052240/. But the editor of Jillunu Oru Kaadhal (there is no Sillunu Oru Kaadhal listed) is listed as Suresh Urs: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0882119/. Due to the inconsistencies, I would have to recommend delete unless reliable sources are provided. Corvus cornix_talk 19:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: editor of a notable/successful film. That should be good enough reason to have an article on him. --GDibyendu (talk) 19:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My spider sense tells me that he is notable, but I want to see refs from reliable sources --triwbe (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • WP:V is required. Corvus cornix_talk 20:20, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless WP:N is proven with WP:RS and WP:V. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:22, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, WP:CSD A7. The article does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. If it doesn't meet that, regular delete for failing to prove it meets WP:N Oroso (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• KEEP: Article has been referenced. Universal Hero (talk) 23:35, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Struck my delete per sources added by User:Universal Hero. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: The list of movies in the article doesn't match the list of movies at imdb. Something's wrong. Corvus cornix_talk 06:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. He is a film editor who has worked in several commercial successes. He definitely satisifies WP:N. Furthermore, please bear in mind that the Indian media's coverage of news surrounding the film technicians is not great. Mspraveen (talk) 09:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just added a suitable reference from a reliable source to the article. Please refer to the news article from The Hindu :) Thanks. Mspraveen (talk) 09:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.