The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The band clearly fails WP:GNG, and the article not (yet) suitable for main article space. In lieu of deleting the history, though, I am fine with it going back to draft space for more incubation. —C.Fred (talk) 21:00, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Antiworld[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band that fails WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. No third-party coverage, no work with any notable label nor any official releases. Promotional article created by single-purpose user with no other editing history. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 23:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 01:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. 94rain ^Talk 01:19, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:Music. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and doesn't satisfy WP:BAND. Lapablo (talk) 09:46, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closer: article creator has moved the article back to draftspace, so this deletion discussion is now moot. Richard3120 (talk) 20:57, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.