The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that he squeaks by after User:Struway2's research. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:56, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archie McLeod[edit]

Archie McLeod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage. JMHamo (talk) 22:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 22:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to Emms/Wells ISBN 978-1-899468-66-9 Scottish League Players' Records 1890/91 to 1938/39 page 169: Archibald G. McLeod Parkhead Juniors/Glasgow Ashfield 1933/34 Partick Thistle 3-2 1934/39 Derry. Cattivi (talk) 16:50, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Emms/Wells book is the definitive work on appearances in the Scottish League in the relevant period, so if they say the Archibald McLeod who played three times for Partick when they were in the Scottish top division whatever it called itself in 1933/34, is the same one who played for Derry until 1938/39, then I'd definitely keep. Thanks Cattivi for the information. I'll add it to the article. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 19:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Fair enough on a technical NFOOTY pass, but I am not sure that 3 apps is enough for GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:50, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - To clarify a point, which Fenix down already said, McLeod does not inherent notability from his notable relative. JMHamo (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not a key part of my argument, it stands apart from this. C679 17:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.