The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (effectively withdrawn). --BDD (talk) 23:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ari Wolfe[edit]

Ari Wolfe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Wolfe Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A sportscaster, nothing notable. It's only source is a dead link. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 21:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can respect your opinions. I understand him working for the NFL Network and I can suggest that you would improve the article. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 00:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
And Bigdan11, I do believe that if you work for five networks such as the CBS Sports Network, Big Ten Network, and other networks may qualify for notability. You should remember on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Bullough when you disagreed with DGG; you also stated that BYU TV is considered a national television network. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 00:47, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Though that article was deleted, there was some question whether the network range of BYU on systems like DirecTV might conceivably be sufficient for it to be a national network. I expressed the view that an announcer for a major network might be notable, and a prominent enough announcer I think would be. Whether this particular individual is prominent enough is something I do not consider myself qualified to determine. DGG ( talk ) 01:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The big difference between Ari Wolfe and Robbie Bullough comes in the number of stations he has been on and the types of networks he has been on. Bullough works for a national network, but BYUtv isn't a major sports network. The last statement on the Robbie Bullough deletion page said that if he worked on one of the major sports networks (ABC, CBS, NBC, ESPN, or FOX), then he would have been qualified enough to meet the notability guidelines. Wolfe has worked with CBS, NBC, ESPN, and BTN (FOX), so I'd say he passes that statement of being notable. There is also the events that Wolfe has done. Wolfe has been the voice of the Arena Football League since the league returned in 2010. He has stayed with the league across NBC Sports Network, NFL Network, and now CBS Sports Network. He has called the Arena Bowl on both NBC and last year on CBS. Then there's the entire factor of Wolfe being an Olympic announcer. Would you not consider the Olympics to be a notable event? Wolfe is employed by NBC to cover an Olympic event. Before he was employed by NBC to do the Olympics, he covered both Summer and Winter Olympic events for Westwood One (Water Polo and Basketball if you want to get specific). I would think that any announcer who has covered the Olympics would meet the notability guideline. Wolfe also covers college football, men's college basketball, women's college basketball, and college baseball in addition to the events I mentioned that he does for Universal Sports. I don't know of many announcers who are employed by CBS, NBC, and ESPN simultaneously, but Wolfe is. I'd say he meets the notability guidelines more than 90% of the announcers that are on Wiki.Bigddan11 (talk) 02:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.