The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Armoured Combat of the Turkish Invasion of Cyprus (1974)[edit]

Armoured Combat of the Turkish Invasion of Cyprus (1974) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Useless page. Content regarding armoured combat in that invasion is best covered in the main article. I see no need for an extraneous page, particularly one with no valuable content. Ironholds (talk) 11:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks like the beginnings of a page that's expecting more to be added, but it's been in this state for over a year. Since there's nothing to merge, let's delete it and keep this topic to the main article. If it needs to be split for size reasons this can be recreated, but I see no evidence that's the case now. Olaf Davis (talk) 12:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 12:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Looks like a needless fork. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: there doesn't seem to be enough content to warrant a separate article in this case. — AustralianRupert (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.