The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 01:35, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arrowbridge II[edit]

Arrowbridge II (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This game does not seem to pass WP:GNG, as I cannot find any third-party coverage of it, and there aren't any claims of notability in the article. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 20:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 20:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 23:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unable to find any notability-demonstrating sources. It's not an A7 candidate so it doesn't have to assert notability, but it does still have to be notable. —chaos5023 (talk) 01:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.