The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 19:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Pedley[edit]

Arthur Pedley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is not sufficiently notable for inclusion. Geoffreyofmonmouth (talk) 17:31, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also concerned at a freshly-knitted editor account leaping straight into action at AfD, deleting biographical articles of Bedford Modern School alumni created or worked upon by MJT21. Something is deeply suspicious about such a new, yet tightly focussed action. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.