The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArticleBot[edit]

ArticleBot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about non-notable software, with defunct website, supported only by two links to unreliable blogs. No WP:RS, no independent coverage, no evidence of notability or even that the software actually exists. Article author says software is "referenced multiple times in Google Books" but hasn't provided any reliable sources to that effect. Article has been without a reliable source for six years. Note that a search finds disparate things called "article bot", "articleBot", etc., but no indication that any of them is notable. -- Finlay McWalterTalk 14:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Finlay McWalterTalk 14:54, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.