The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Time in North Korea. Without prejudice to a broader discussion about what to do with such articles.  Sandstein  14:09, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Asia/Pyongyang[edit]

Asia/Pyongyang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary stub; no inherent notability in itself; suggest merge into Time in North Korea. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 13:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Only because, for whatever strange reason, time zone stubs of this sort are actually all over the place, and apparently people are happy to keep them. E.g. Antarctica/DumontDUrville, America/Bahia_Banderas, Asia/Sakhalin... doesn't seem to make much sense to kill one particular example if the type is considered fine. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Either there are sources to write an article on this topic or there aren't. If the latter, the solution would be to merge the aforementioned articles into a single article/list. czar 01:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Time in North Korea. Not enough information available to support two articles. I suggest it may be worth looking into the suitability of the other timezone stubs. They look like they would be more useful being redirected to the appropriate countries, though you could argue otherwise on the basis of their Infoboxes. PriceDL (talk) 07:06, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This might need a broader evaluation of what we do with article such as these. Personally I think we can safely delete it as I don't see the need for a redirect (semantic search will automatically take readers to Time in North Korea). But I would like to have some time to see how these pages are handled in general. Could this be relisted? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Please ping me if I somehow overlook this --Lemongirl942 (talk) 02:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Time in North Korea. I don't see enough to keep a separate article, and I can't imagine anyone that knows about the database this information is taken from would then try to search under that term here. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a poor argument for keeping but Lemongirl942 has a point in that there should be a discussion of this class of articles. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.