The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 18:40, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Club Championship and AFC Champions League records and statistics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced (an external link is no reference) affair that read like WP:OR and fancruft The Banner talk 12:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, only need more cites, just see European Cup and UEFA Champions League records and statistics.--Lisan1233 (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – This is the major event in Asian club soccer, like the European Champions League. This is a list of results that has been split from the main articles where it would have taken too much space. These lists are allowed for major sporting events, for the major statistics only. – Margin1522 (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - a notable competition comparable to other continental level competitions who also have such articles. Needs additional formatting and a reduction in cruft and disorientatingly coloured tablesm but these are not reasons to delete. Fenix down (talk) 16:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly notable as above; needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 08:57, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely Notable. Needs better copyediting. Vinay84 (talk) 03:12, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.