The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:23, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Association of Breeders and Owners of Paso Horses in La Libertad[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG, created by a now banned editor. Unusual not to see a Spanish article of this. I did a search under the Spanish name "La Asociación de Criadores y Propietarios de Caballos Peruanos de Paso" and only found very local coverage confirming it held events. LibStar (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:16, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: Perspective from someone active in WikiProject Equine is that a search for third-party coverage should include equine publications for the nation or publications for the horse breed (presumably Paso Fino or Peruvian Paso). Many major horse activities will still only be covered in specialized niche publications. BUT If a blank there, then likely of only local interest. Aside from GNG, my own view is that the status of the editor is irrelevant, the article topic is either notable on its own merits or not. At present, I'm leaning delete, but I could be convinced otherwise if people find solid third party sources. Mostly posting just to comment on places to look. (And I personally don't care enough about this particular article to go check it out myself, so this is all a FWIW). Montanabw^(talk) 20:59, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - taking into account Montanabw's comments and my own search, I don't believe this meets the requirements outlined at WP:ORGDEPTH. Stalwart111 06:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.