The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SmartSE (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aston villa life[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable football blog, Also seems most references are just football commentarys & what not. -
→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 04:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability, not even worth re-directing. Giant Snowman 15:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - GNG failure, inherently promotional in tone to a greater or lesser extent as well. Fenix down (talk) 13:56, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the subject has not received enough coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Mentoz (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – is not notable, lacks any kind of significant coverage. Time to close this discussion, too. C 679 12:57, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.