The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination Withdrawn. Lenticel ^(talk) 03:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Atlin mountain[edit]

Atlin mountain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable mountain with no sources to justify why it's notable. Also written in a POV style. Tinton5 (talk) 03:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I can't find the appropriate notability guideline, but it's unlikely that a named mountain doesn't satisfy it. Plenty of reliable sources attest to its existence.[1] [2] [3](press Show more) [4] Clarityfiend (talk) 09:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - A well-sourced article at this time, and Wikipedia also functions as a gazetteer.

• "Atlin Mountain (Map)" (PDF). British Columbia Ministry of Energy and Mines and Responsible for Housing. Retrieved March 15, 2012. ((cite web)): External link in |publisher= (help)
• "Item 2011.3.1.28 - Atlin mountain, Atlin, BC". University of Northern British Columbia Archives. Retrieved March 15, 2012. ((cite web)): External link in |publisher= (help)
• "Atlin Hiking". The Province of British Columbia: Ministry of Jobs, Tourism and Innovation. Retrieved March 15, 2012. ((cite web)): External link in |publisher= (help)
• Patrick, Tom (April 7, 2010). "Snowmobilers have a drag in Atlin". Yukon News. Retrieved March 15, 2012. ((cite web)): External link in |publisher= (help)
• "Atlin Taku Land Use Plan Proposed Protected Areas: Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). British Columbia Ministry of Natural Resource Operations. Retrieved March 15, 2012. ((cite web)): External link in |publisher= (help); no-break space character in |title= at position 51 (help)

—Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Wikipedia:Notability (geography): "Named geographic features are usually considered notable. This includes mountains, lakes, streams, islands etc." --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep nearly all named geographic features are considered notable enough, and have been since I can remember. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw. I have decided to withdraw this nomination, due to the efforts of those who added verifiable sources, thus establishing notability. Thanks. Tinton5 (talk) 00:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.