The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SNOW and WP:SK The article has been tagged for for expansion and clean up. (non-admin closure) Dusti^SPEAK!! 04:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Attack of the Mutant Penguins[edit]

Attack of the Mutant Penguins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable software, prod removed. WuhWuzDat 16:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The article is in terrible shape, but the game was from a major publisher for a major console and that gives it notability. TJ Spyke 17:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. TJ Spyke 17:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per reviews listed on Mobygames. Nifboy (talk) 19:47, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Per Nifboy. Joe Chill (talk) 20:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and rewrite. There are several major press reviews (as noted by Nifboy) and the publisher is notable (as noted by TJ Spyke). Meets WP:N. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 20:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep commercial game release by a major publisher. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – notability easily established here, despite the clear User:Mcjakeqcool-type editing. –MuZemike 21:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.