The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Lean Bear. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 14:22, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Avonaco[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Forwarding from a PROD because I feel like this deserves a more rigorous examination to determine if the tribe exists, and if so, what should be done with the article. PROD concern was: "non notable first name. not a separate tribe or branch of a tribe that I can tell." Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 01:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 01:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 01:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 01:11, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I was the original PRODer. I searched Google and Google Books and found no indication that "Avonaco" was, as appears to be claimed, a Cheyenne tribe. It turns up on a bunch of baby name sites as a Cheyenne first name, but no reliable sources indicate it's the first name of anyone notable that might merit a disambig page. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Lean Bear. Alternative spelling of Awoninahku (signatory of the Treaty of Fort Wise) per a few sources such as this ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 05:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm on board for this redirect. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be on board as well. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 20:30, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nom and close the discussion then? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:24, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.