The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 23:32, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Axdas[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable musician failing WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. A BEFORE search doesn’t provide anything. Xclusivzik (talk) 19:26, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable. Renata•3 01:01, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - significant coverage in reliable, independent sources does not appear forthcoming. firefly ( t · c ) 08:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete - No significant coverage whatsoever in the sources used. -- Kevin19781 (talk) 18:02, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Is not notable, not enough RS. Alex-h (talk) 11:13, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Totally did not get the neeeds to qualify. Nigerlite (talk) 12:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Absolutely zero reliable sources that demonstrate notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 04:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage, fails WP:GNG. Bapinghosh (talk) 13:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I should note that the creator removed the AFD template from the article, with the result that I accidentally initiated a second AFD on this article for the same reasons before somebody tipped me off that this discussion was still open. (I've withdrawn and closed that.) At any rate, musicians are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because their own music metaverifies its own existence on a streaming platform -- the notability test requires certain specific quantifiable achievements, independently verified by a certain specific calibre of reliable source coverage in real media. But this is referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all (Spotify streams, IMDb, the self-published websites of people or organizations that he's been directly affiliated with, the subject's own social media feed), and claims nothing about him that would be "inherently" notable enough under WP:NMUSIC to exempt the referencing from having to be much, much better than this. Bearcat (talk) 12:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not only are there no valid sources present in the article, there is nothing found in searches either. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.