The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 16:04, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Azeem Ahmed Tariq[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not part of significant event, coverage should continue if that was significant for an encyclopedic entry. Fails WP:NPOL. Störm (talk) 13:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Still mentioned as a "great leader" by prominent Pakistani politicians. His murder is still a source of controversy in Pakistan. Plenty of sources, among them academic works: [1], [2],[3] , [4],[5], [6] and more. 37.117.118.138 (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Easily meets WP:GNG. Widely discussed in the scholarly literature. Look at this GBOOKS search for an idea of how this nomination is one more in a series of extraordinarily misguided deletion discussions initiated by this nominator.192.160.216.52 (talk) 15:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.