The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 13:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BEML[edit]

Tagged as speedy ((db|no establishment of notability, advertising)) but that's not a WP:CSD criterion so bringing it here. Article as written is poor quality spam but company may meet WP:CORP in which case perhaps some kind soul will help out in the interests of systemic bias. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 13:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete as advert, currently unverifiable. Stifle 16:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. 61 Google news hits for "BEML"[1] (plus some more for the whole name[2]). According to this link, they are the second-largest Asian manufacturer of earthmoving equipment. -Colin Kimbrell 15:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the article as best I can, and I think it's a workable stub now. Maybe someone who knows more about finance than I do can build from here. -Colin Kimbrell 16:33, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep as rewritten - a shoo-in, in fact, even without taking systemic bias into account. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep this is one of Asia's largest company of earth-moving equipment. This article should not be deleted because it one of Asia's top equipment companies. -Effer 16:47, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Effer and JzG --kingboyk 13:03, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.