The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BRAAAAAINS![edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable card game which was apparently made available only a few days ago.^{[dead link]} There are no hits for "BRAAAAAINS!" "top media studios" on Google Books, News, or News archives, and the article was created by an account controlled by the game's publisher, Top Media Studios. CtP (t • c) 23:10, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails WP:N. After some searching, not finding any coverage in reliable sources whatsoever. Northamerica1000^(talk) 02:15, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree entirely with Northamerica1000; fails WP:N spectacularly. Stalwart111 (talk) 03:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable new gaaaaaaaaaaame! Carrite (talk) 14:07, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources and even BGG doesn't really have anything [1]. Hobit (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, per nom, per not being notableCurb Chain (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW. Unreferenced and unencyclopedic in tone. Cyan Gardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 00:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.