The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus and move to Military Spouse. Actually, there is no consensus, and the nomination could be closed as such. However, we have two opinions that she fails WP:GNG, and one opinion that the journal is better covered by WP:GNG than its founder, therefore the middle ground seems to be move.Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Babette Maxwell[edit]

Babette Maxwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see any notability whatsoever. The bio centers around the magazine she founded (which itself might be notable), but that doesn't merit notability for her biography. Plus, FYI, creator User:Dmax5o looks to be a single-purpose account. bender235 (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:30, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (tc) 02:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 06:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.