The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 02:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Backflip Studios[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 6 employee game developer that is developing an, apparently popular, iphone app/game.

The game they made, paper toss, perhaps is notable (it has a page of its own, along with some forks, which are of questionable notability), but that doesn't inherit to the parent company.

The news search reveals 2 sources in the past month, both of which talk about the game. Lots of social networking presence for the company, but not a lot of third party rs links. Shadowjams (talk) 05:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep I just did a Google search and there are lots of game reviews for the games the company developed, as well as reviews for the company itself. Paper Toss, Paper Toss: World Tour, and Ragdoll Blaster are very popular iPhone apps. This company could have potential in the future. --NerdyScienceDude :) ^{(click here to talk to me)} 05:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Post those links because my google search showed a bunch of promotional marketing by the company, and then 2 google news hits, that I mention above. Shadowjams (talk) 05:42, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Just so many reviews and news for the company and its apps. The company is certainly noteable. If you need more links, I can find more. --NerdyScienceDude :) ^{(click here to talk to me)} 14:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, they don't just develop a 'game', they develop multiple games. --NerdyScienceDude :) ^{(click here to talk to me)} 14:46, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep of the links supplied by Nerdy above, this Venture Beat interview/piece and this Pocket Gamer interview cover WP:N IMO. There's also this 'new year' interview on Pocket Gamer. Should be OK. Someone another 17:31, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article is pitiful, but it stands to reason that a publisher with multiple notable games is itself notable. That said, I'd probably vote to delete or merge if it isn't fixed within a reasonable amount of time. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Yes the article is fairly poor but the developer is notable and has a lot of reliable sources to back it up. I Smashed TALK! 16:26, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.