The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog (software)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable project management software. All of the references are either PR churn excluded by WP:SPIP and WP:ORGIND or blogs and other non-RS sourcing that also doesn't count towards WP:N. The page is also currently nothing more than a directory listing that runs afoul of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per reasons for nomination. Bruzer Fox 08:57, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: article makes no claim of NOTEability, and I can't seem to find any on the web. Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.