- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Halsey discography. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 06:15, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Badlands (Live from Webster Hall) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A search of Google and News finds little coverage that actually demonstrates anything other than the existence of this album. Not notable per WP:NALBUMS. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 14:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Should the fact that it's Halsey's first live album noteworthy enough, not to mention it includes a reissue of her first studio album? I wouldn't vote for this article's deletion because it definitely helps learning about every album in an artist's discography, but if the article were to be deleted, could it be then added to the article for the 'Badland' studio album, since this is basically a reissue of the album with a live set of the tracks included, maybe as a separate section in the article or as part of the track listing section of the 'Badlands' article? Bryan McLaude (talk) 01:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't mean its notable per WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. Notability is not inherited. Not every album released by an artist gets an article just because the artist has released albums before. Pages on wikipedia do not exist to create notability for a particular project, we cover notable topics. Per WP:ALTTRACKLIST,
"Include track listings for alternative editions only when they are significantly different and when the tracks are the subject of extensive commentary in the article. In such cases, additional track listings can be listed under subheadings. Otherwise, notable differences can be summarised in the prose in lieu of additional track lists."
. By default, we shouldn't include the track listing at the Badlands page unless the live album was of significance. E.g. if it led to an uplift in sales or was the subject of critical commentary. Otherwise it just appears in the artist discography as a release without any details. If people want to see the track listing they can check out retailers. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 20:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero Parlez Moi 12:37, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I mean it exists, you can find coverage all over the place. Mostly just mentions of the album release or track listings. Nothing substantial upon which to base an article. I didn't see any reviews in my search either. I get "reviews" in Billboard with "Stream it now!" popping up, it's little more than a repost of social media postings. No traction for the album. Oaktree b (talk) 20:20, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.