- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:16, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Baghdadi Clasico[edit]
- Baghdadi Clasico (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
May be made-up. Google search returns no hits for this topic [1]. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:15, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no evidence that this is a notable sporting rivalry. GiantSnowman 07:57, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:NRIVALRY, derbies are not inherently notable and specifically not notable because they have been played a number of times, they require significant reliable coverage in third party sources, beyond WP:ROUTINE stat sites to establish GNG. Fenix down (talk) 14:49, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - WP:NRIVALRY states that derbies are not inherently notable, meaning that they should not just be considered notable due to their status as a derby. This is not the same as what you mention ("inherently non-notable"), which indicates that derbies are naturally not notable. Minor syntax mistake, I assume, but still worth a clarification. Regards.--MarshalN20 Talk 20:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Marshal, I have updated my comment. Fenix down (talk) 07:21, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.