The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Balazsy[edit]

No evidence has been proffered for any claim made in the article other than claims made within the personal website, www.pbpix.com, of the subject of the article. The content of the article is not verifiable.

Incidentally, the sole contributor to the article of claims and other content has been User:Pbpix, whose user page identifies himself as P G Balazsy and all of whose activities within WP have been closely related to P G Balazsy. -- Hoary 06:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I cannot find any reliable secondary corroborating sources for subject's claim to fame, the so-called "Fuji transfer process". Please also co-nominate Fuji transfer. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 06:46, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't be surprised or upset by anybody else's nomination of that article (yours, for example), but I don't intend to nominate it myself quite yet. Let's see how this AfD goes first. -- Hoary 07:45, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Too more delete votes (one being mine admittedly) is enough, let us discuss his process at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watergraph. -- RHaworth 13:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails to meet WP:NOTE --Haemo 07:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Spam. -- RHaworth 13:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No RS, no notability, plenty of spam. Realkyhick 04:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.