The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I found the reasoning of Phil Bridger to be most convincing. This article is named 'Baron Mulingar' but says nothing about him. We already have an article on Viscounts Gormanston, and some of this material could have been cut and pasted from there. Article could be userfied if anyone thinks something might be salvaged EdJohnston (talk) 02:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Mulingar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a genealogy but I can't see how the family is notable independent of a few members who have Wikipedia articles. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:19, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All are notable as members of the (defunct) Irish House of Lords or United Kingdom House of Lords. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:49, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Eastmain.Edward321 (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Earl of Carbery, entire content of the article is not about the Peerage title of Baron of Mulingar. Content contains duplicate content to the article Viscount Gormanston & Gormanston, County Meath (looks like a cut and paste), a slective genealogy of the Preston family (family head is the holder of the Peerage title of Gormanston) and a description of the Gormanston Arms. No link is shown or asserted between the title of Viscount Gormanston nor the Preston family to the title Baron Mulingar. --blue520 04:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to satisfy all criteria, to the point and referenced. (Historyislife (talk) 10:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC))— Historyislife (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep I agree and concur.(Leeadam68 (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2010 (UTC))— Leeadam68 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Keep There seems to have been a non-issue here. artical should stand as is. Irishlibraryguy (talk) 13:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC) — Irishlibraryguy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Relisted to generate more discussion among established users. Cunard (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per blue520. Edison (talk) 21:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The article title is Baron Mulingar but the content is all about the Barons and Viscounts Gormanston, about whom we already have an article. The name "Mulingar" doesn't appear anywhere in the article, so this doesn't even tell us what the title is supposed to mean. If there are any reliable sources that say that Baron/Viscount Mulingar is a title held by the Prestons then this can be a redirect, but otherwise it should be deleted. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.