The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn - per WP:OUTCOMES – Dreadstar † 09:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Batterstown[edit]

Batterstown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Content is unsourced, and a quick google search yielded a number of touristy links, but few facts or history. I was unable to ascertain any notability from my quick search. – Dreadstar † 07:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The article content is dreadful and needs heavy copyediting, but per WP:OUTCOMES, geographical places are inherently notable. Wl219 07:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:OUTCOMES– Dreadstar † 09:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep in rewritten form Did you guys read the article? It's a joke article. It's taking the piss. Bears and Ligers roaming the streets? You did realise that's a picture of Buckingham Palace there? I'll rewrite it and then it should be monitored for vandalism. Nick mallory 07:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • This might help with proper sourcing: [1] Wl219 08:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten it now and removed the, rather entertaining, nonsense. Nick mallory 08:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As per WP:OUTCOMES "Cities and villages are notable, regardless of size". Shabda 09:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]