The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for Mospyne[edit]

Battle for Mospyne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a recreation of an article that previously existed on the Battle of Mospyne, which was already merged and redirected to Mospyne due to a lack of significant coverage by reliable sources.[1] This version is an almost identical translation of the Ukrainian Wikipedia article uk:Бій під Моспиним, albeit with less attention given to the sourcing, some examples of poor translation and even some factual errors. As this isn't substantially different from the earlier (now merged and redirected) article, and I'd argue even represents a downgrade in quality, I'm nominating this article for deletion. Grnrchst (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom's arguments. Tehonk (talk) 08:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.