The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Eastern Jutland (Denmark)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See WP:NRIVALRY; there is no evidence of this passing WP:GNG. The article is nothing more than original research and a synthesis of match stats. Also see WP:NOTSTATS. Spiderone 12:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note - Also consider these previous AfDs: Battle of Central Jutland and Battle of South-Eastern Jutland Spiderone 12:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 12:46, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:48, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:FOOTYN, no indication the club has played in a national competition, no indication of any other achievements garnering sufficient significant, independent coverage to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 13:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Was that comment meant for a different AfD? This one is about a rivalry, not a club.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:07, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - It was thanks, copied the wrong boilerplate rationale. Fenix down (talk) 15:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NRIVALRY, no evidence of GNG. Simply because two teams play each other regularly does not create a de facto rivalry. Even if there is a rivalry, it has to be demonstrated that this has received significant, reliable coverage as a notion in itself, not simply the synthesis of a series of match reports. Fenix down (talk) 15:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Fails WP:GNG for a sports rivalry. This follows the same reason I gave at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Central Jutland: Although the term 'ærkerivalen" (archrival) is used in news sources about matches between these 2 teams, my search of RS Danish news sources found no significant coverage about the rivalry itself nor any established use of the title "Battle of Eastern Jutland." In fact, Battle of Central/Eastern/Southeastern Jutland is used for matches among several Jutland soccer clubs. Without any specific significant coverage in reliable sources for this rivalry or term, the article fails WP:NRIVALRY. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 01:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 07:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.