- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
BeWeeVee[edit]
- BeWeeVee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A software company and product. No indication of notability (WP:GNG) in the article, and none in a Google News search. Sandstein 13:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as this is still questionable for the applicable notability despite the few links listed. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It seems like the product has been fairly dead since 2010. I found some mentions of the product but they were nigh all from 2009 and 2010. Note that the article has also just been wiki-managed after 2010 — as in the creators gave up on it. I can't even visit their website. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 19:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.