The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beer Blow[edit]

Beer Blow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Disputed prod (and rightfully-declined speedy). notability doesn't seem to be present and, although sources are provided, none are reliable since all amount to self-publication. Doesn't seem to be sufficiently similar to Beer pong to be melded with it. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:57, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No reliable sources, no substantial coverage (even by pop-culture standards). --Orange Mike | Talk 20:59, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete please, following the above. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not encyclopaedic, nor sufficiently notable. Richard Harvey (talk) 23:04, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per WP:NFT. This appears to be something made up in school one day, which WP is not Ohconfucius (talk) 04:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because even if it wasn't made up in one day the article's a how-to and WP:NOTHOWTO. Morenoodles (talk) 10:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.