The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:22, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beezer (video game)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While there is reason to believe that the game could be notable, all there is is an infobox, a short statement about what it is, and how you play it. And... when I did a Yahoo search I got lots of different things, such as a website with game strategies, a dictionary entry that says it's a slang word for nose, and tons of other miscellaneous stuff... Kayau Voting IS evil 14:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) Ost (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage whatsoever that I could find in a WP:VG reliable source search, everything lead to a person known as "Beazer". No relevant Google hits, either. It probably exists, but there's nothing here to establish notability. --Teancum (talk) 15:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I had a look for sources a few days ago and came back empty handed. Early arcade games can be a swine to source, and in cases like these are best left to arcade history projects who don't have the same requirements for sources. Fails WP:N and WP:V due to a lack of reliable sources. Someone another 23:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.