The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G3, blatant hoax. A7 and G10 were also plausible. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This page certainly doesn't belong here; however, there is a claim to notability. "HE is infomous for his heroic actions, many of which children's lives have been saved." And while I believe this is a hoax, it doesn't seem to be blatant. This is an almost certain delete as lacking notability (even if the lion event was true he would only be notable for one event). Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:06, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability.
Although, it does sayThe criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines
This confuses me now as to the difference between a credible and uncredible claim of significance. Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible.