The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No need to draw this out even more, consensus is clear. Randykitty (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Beny Wagner[edit]

Beny Wagner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources. MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:12, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Actors and filmmakers, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I don’t know how to add it, but this should be sorted under Authors as well. BhamBoi (talk) 20:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I was able to find this article about him and his work in Artforum International.

• Scrimgeour, Alexander (February 2014). "Openings: Beny Wagner". Artforum International. Retrieved February 18, 2023.

But whether there is additional coverage of him in art and film-focused media, I do not know. Silverseren^C 21:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep passes WP:GNG based on few of his [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Plainlovesea (talk) 18:53, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shawn Teller (talk) 14:02, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep meets WP:GNG Justwatchmee (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Meets WP:GNG. Tons of sources posted as well.KatoKungLee (talk) 16:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Looks like consensus is developing to keep, but Relisting to get more participation and be certain before closing
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Shawn Teller (talk) 16:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The first two films in the trilogy have attracted enough critical attention to give him a pass at WP:FILMMAKER in my opinion. Some sources do include interviews, but even if we ignore the interview parts of the sources, the remainder gives us enough to meet criterion 3 of the subject matter notability guideline. I added content and sources and organised the article better before making this comment. CT55555(talk) 19:41, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.