The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nom rightly drew attention to lack of verification. This has been addressed sufficiently to merit retention of the article, but I note and agree with observations that sourcing could still be improved and would benefit from translations into English and sources in English. Tyrenius 05:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bernd Fasching[edit]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. Tyrenius 21:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Notability in question; multiple, non trivial sources needed to establish notability Bus stop 14:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep , the problems with WP:V are more pressing than those with WP:N. Fasching is indeed a known Austrian sculptor and if the article survives this AfD it should be tagged as lacking sources. The Diva Award on the other hand is a little iffy, it is presented by a consulting firm, and from what I gather from their own rules it is more a publicity gimmick than a serious sign of notability Alf^Photoman 23:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now I've added a couple more sources (in German), including a pic and brief description of his Vienna Mirror in what seems to be a serious art magazine. I'm still unsure of his "100-year"/permanent notability though. More sources would be good, and a bit of translation would be very handy! --Mereda 09:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly notable, just needs more sources --J2thawiki 09:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've added an English speaking source reffering to several of his works, including a lot of pictures and a link to a long list of secondary literature and TV appearances of his projects--Moerd 10:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
KeepOn the basis partly of Moerd's link I think Johnbod 20:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.